PDA

View Full Version : Australian researchers scrap GM peas after mice fall ill


cochise
November 24th, 2005, 04:10 PM
Australian researchers scrap GM peas after mice fall ill

SYDNEY (AFP) - Australian researchers have confirmed they have scrapped 10 years of research into genetically modified peas because the altered version caused lung inflammation in mice.

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) had been attempting to modify peas so they could resist insect attacks without the use of chemical sprays.

It said in a statement that the study was discontinued "because the GM peas did not satisfy all categories of a stringent risk assessment process."

The peas, which were almost 100 percent resistant against pea weevil attacks, caused inflammation of lung tissue in mice and other adverse affects, researchers said.

"The reaction of the mice to the protein (involved) might reflect something that would happen to humans," deputy chief of CSIRO plant industry T. J. Higgins told ABC radio.

"There isn't any evidence that would happen but there is a chance that it could happen."

The pea weevil -- known to science as Bruchus pisorum -- can cause yield losses of up to 30 percent a year if left untreated and posed a risk to Australia's 100 million dollar (73 million US) pea industry.

Higgins said the work supported the need for a case-by-case examination of plants developed using genetic modification.

"Even though this GM field pea research will not be progressed further, the technology is very valuable and we're considering applying it to other research," he said.

winter_unfazed
May 28th, 2009, 09:43 AM
Well, at least they did the right thing and stopped it. Sometimes it seems they just keep on going and taking it to market, no matter what the studies show, because they've invested a lot of funding in it.

FAADAN
May 28th, 2009, 12:37 PM
Well, at least they did the right thing and stopped it. Sometimes it seems they just keep on going and taking it to market, no matter what the studies show, because they've invested a lot of funding in it.

Obviously not Monsanto.

deciduousLychees
May 28th, 2009, 04:29 PM
Here's the organization's actual report (http://www.csiro.au/news/GMPeaStudy.html), which is actually pretty interesting, as it offers a reason for this.

Of course, it also has this (http://www.csiro.au/files/mediaRelease/mr2000/prGMLupins.htm).

RozieDozie
May 28th, 2009, 05:22 PM
"The GMAC-approved trial was conducted over six weeks with 80 sheep that were divided equally into two groups and fed a cereal-hay based diet containing either modified or unmodified lupin seed...."

The sheep trial lasted 6 weeks. I wonder what those sheep will look like after 6 years of feeding them GMO lupine. <..>0000~

deciduousLychees
May 28th, 2009, 07:18 PM
Probably like sheep who ate lupine for six years.

reubenT
May 31st, 2009, 10:59 PM
so why do they keep looking in the wrong place for solutions? Old Dr reams figgered out how to keep those bugs at bay many years ago. and boost crop yealds significantly at the same time. Oh but the university scientists are too inteligent to listen to old codgers like him.
Did ya ever hear about old 'mutton chops'? he was the cuban dr who knew what yellow fever was caused by many years before the leading scientists figgured it out, but they refused to listen to him because he wasn't a polished researcher. Finally one Dr was assigned to the research team who was open minded enough to listen to old dr mutton chops and take him seriously, he solved the problem.

winter_unfazed
June 1st, 2009, 09:37 AM
Probably like sheep who ate lupine for six years.

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that GM is no different from regular lupine?

deciduousLychees
June 1st, 2009, 11:16 AM
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that GM is no different from regular lupine?Well, unless someone can show otherwise.

older than dirt
June 2nd, 2009, 02:48 PM
It interests me that so many of the GM crops have been modifed in part or fully with human genes. I understand that geneticly humans are much like mice or
milk weed & the needed genes could have just as easly come from other life forms.
So if the needed genes could come from other life forms why do they insist on using human dna ? Seems like some preverted attempt to make every one guilty of cannibalism . Perhaps Im just being overly sensitive .

deciduousLychees
June 2nd, 2009, 03:38 PM
Which ones that aren't being developed for a medicinal purpose have human genes?

older than dirt
June 3rd, 2009, 12:33 AM
Most of the food crops that have been modified ,human genes were used in some way or another . Im not a resercher & dont have any sights on hand to look them up but do remember time after time a few years ago human dna being used on our food corn ,wheat ,soy ect.
I think the reason was the human genes were maped first & was there for easyer for them to use but still it seemed & seems wrong to me.