NASA Scientists letter regarding CO2 and climate change

[roberte]

Originally Posted by FAADAN

My letter lists Astronaut and Propulsion. Your claims list nothing.

You do realize those lists were developed a year ago, right?

And since then, not a single piece of propaganda has come out of the denial-o-sphere in an effort to debunk the research based on those lists.

And since then, not a single piece of propaganda has come out of the denial-o-sphere in an effort to claim those authors were unqualified.

[Silverbeard]

Originally Posted by roberte

My second list is the AUTHORS of research papers whose findings are accepted by the 98% of the scientists with demonstrated expertise in those fields.

So your paper includes only folks with direct financial ties to the topic, and purposely doesnt include anyone who can read and understand the claims. Vast swaths of whom do not agree, despite the repetition by media... interesting... the 98 percent figure is hilarious. Anyone who believes it imo knows very little on the topic.

[roberte]

Originally Posted by Silverbeard

So your paper includes only folks with direct financial ties to the topic...

IF you have evidence that , in your opinion, supports those types of claims this would be a really really good time to bring them forward.


Otherwise, all you've done is show the level of rhetoric the denial camp stoops to in an effort to discredit the science.

Well documented, well established, well accepted science.

[Silverbeard]

If you say so roberte... the science discredited itself when it had to ignore entire fields of expertise, downplay others, inflate others, cherry pick others... I cited aspects of all of this. You labelled it all outlier. It isnt scientific to only include data that fits your favorite theory... It should be clear who the real climate denialists are...

[roberte]

Originally Posted by Silverbeard

If you say so roberte... the science discredited itself when it had to ignore entire fields of expertise, downplay others, inflate others, cherry pick others... I cited aspects of all of this. You labelled it all outlier. It isnt scientific to only include data that fits your favorite theory... It should be clear who the real climate denialists are...

When we see what you consider substantive evidence......


"ignore entire fields of expertise"

", downplay others,"

" inflate others,"

" cherry pick others."


instead of your claims to have done so.



(just an fyi; some places you claim I ignore your sources, other places you claim I argue they are outlier data. Which is it?; do I ignore or prove the invalidity of your claims' resources?)

[Silverbeard]

Originally Posted by roberte

When we see what you consider substantive evidence......


"ignore entire fields of expertise"

", downplay others,"

" inflate others,"

" cherry pick others."


instead of your claims to have done so.

In actual reality, I did all that. you played your weird mind games, and 50 posts later, i guess you hope people believe you that all I did was claim it.... Your games are to tedious for me, Im not going to post the same things 100 times.

(just an fyi; some places you claim I ignore your sources, other places you claim I argue they are outlier data. Which is it?; do I ignore or prove the invalidity of your claims' resources?)

Both and other related nonsense. You seriously do not realize this??? You dont remember having done it? i find that hard to believe.

[roberte]

Originally Posted by Silverbeard

In actual reality, I did all that.

Besides Beck, what original research - no matter how poorly received by the scientific world - have you posted links to?

And that is why I ask for your solid evidence of your claims.

[FAADAN]

Originally Posted by roberte

You do realize those lists were developed a year ago, right?

And since then, not a single piece of propaganda has come out of the denial-o-sphere in an effort to debunk the research based on those lists.

And since then, not a single piece of propaganda has come out of the denial-o-sphere in an effort to claim those authors were unqualified.

Why waste your time trying to debunk something you do not see as important?

[roberte]

Originally Posted by FAADAN

Why waste your time trying to debunk something you do not see as important?

Showing the vacuity of your argument.